.jpg)
You Can Get This Powerful Mini PC for Under $150 Today
37 minutes ago
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Friday, August 29, 2008
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Rogues, Zlob Sites, Banner Ads, Email Harvesting, IE Privacy, Phishers Target Teens
Latest Security & News Info
Monday, August 25, 2008
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Friday, August 22, 2008
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Viruslist July Stats, New IM Threat, Fake Celeb Sites=Malware, Vista & SP1, XP & XP3, Windows 7-Major Or Minor?
Latest Security & News Info
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
WOT The F........
So there you are, a security vendor who uses some third party sources to supply security advice\ratings to be included in your product. Now, one would think that you would want said third party vendors to have something to offer which would aid in your product to be the best it can be.
Cost effectiveness can be one item, tho this is not always the case nor need it be.
Dependability comes to mind. What good is something if you can't rely on it? Not much.
Then there is always a matter of reliability, which when it comes right down to it, trumps the other two. If you can't trust them or the service\product they offer to be reliable, what's the point? In the end the one that suffers most is the end user.
Imagine now if you read the following, about a third party vendor, or rather all third party vendors who supply services to another product:
WOT Forums
If you don't trust them, why the hell are you using them? What sort of business uses resources\products\services it does not trust?Can you imagine if McAfee, Symantec or any other security vendor said that about someone who provided them such service?
Symantec just bought PCTools, do you think they trust them enough to improve the reliability of their product line? Ya, you betcha.
Did AVG trust Exploit Labs when they bought them out, with their LinkScanner tech? I'm sure they did.
Oh sure, maybe in this case there is no money exchanging hands, but to me at least, trust has a price on it that can't be calculated.
So, someone tell me how any security minded person can recommend a security tool from a company who gets something that is aided by third party vendors, when said security vendor does not trust the service it is geting from that third party?
Full thread:
Web Of Trust: How Trustful Is It?
Cost effectiveness can be one item, tho this is not always the case nor need it be.
Dependability comes to mind. What good is something if you can't rely on it? Not much.
Then there is always a matter of reliability, which when it comes right down to it, trumps the other two. If you can't trust them or the service\product they offer to be reliable, what's the point? In the end the one that suffers most is the end user.
Imagine now if you read the following, about a third party vendor, or rather all third party vendors who supply services to another product:
We don't consider our automated sources equally reliable
WOT Forums
If you don't trust them, why the hell are you using them? What sort of business uses resources\products\services it does not trust?Can you imagine if McAfee, Symantec or any other security vendor said that about someone who provided them such service?
Symantec just bought PCTools, do you think they trust them enough to improve the reliability of their product line? Ya, you betcha.
Did AVG trust Exploit Labs when they bought them out, with their LinkScanner tech? I'm sure they did.
Oh sure, maybe in this case there is no money exchanging hands, but to me at least, trust has a price on it that can't be calculated.
So, someone tell me how any security minded person can recommend a security tool from a company who gets something that is aided by third party vendors, when said security vendor does not trust the service it is geting from that third party?
Full thread:
Web Of Trust: How Trustful Is It?
Zango, Rogues, spam, Symantec Buys PCTools, IE8 'Private' Surfing, Vista PCs Downgraded
Latest Security & News Info
Monday, August 18, 2008
Forums Getting There....
They're restoring back ups now, but hosting company says no eta on complettion of task.
Sorry/
Sorry/
Forums Down.....
Hosting company says they're having problems with their iSCSI storage array, I'll post updates here as I get them.
Sorry for any inconveineince.
Sorry for any inconveineince.
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Friday, August 15, 2008
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Botnet Masters Busted, BitDefender Top 10, New Rogues, New Windows 7 Blog, Vundo Top Variants, More SQL Sites
Latest Security & News Info
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
AcTiveX Security, Browser Hijacks, Zlob Updates, Cybercrime Services, Parents Fret Over 'M' Rated Games
Latest Security & News Info
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Monday, August 11, 2008
Sunday, August 10, 2008
Saturday, August 09, 2008
Latest News Weekend Aug 8
Latest Security & News Info
- Fraudsters: Collected Info Exposed, Not Hidden
- Rogue Banner Ad Updates
- MS Security Bulletin Advance Notification
- User Question: HJT Analysis, Too Many Steps?
- User Review: Drive Snapshot
- XP Still Outselling Vista
- TeMerc Rant: Looping Vids On CNET Pages
- New Spybot=Vundo Killer?
- Greedy Vendors: Those With 'Extras'-New
- TeMerc July Site Stats
Thursday, August 07, 2008
Wednesday, August 06, 2008
Top Celeb Spams, DNS Flaw Hits Inboxes, Spam @ 150bn, ,Smitfraud Updates, 3 Newsletters, Russian Hacking Gang
Latest Security & News Info
Tuesday, August 05, 2008
Fake Files To View MEdia, Google Targeted, Spam Report, Zlob Updates, Rogue Banner Ads, Windows 7
Latest Security & News Info
Monday, August 04, 2008
Saturday, August 02, 2008
Apple Patch, SiteMeter Causing Crashes, Xbox Price Cut, Nvidia Exiting Chipsets, Laptops Kept @ Borders
Latest Security & News Info
Friday, August 01, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
